[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses)

From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:27:21 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:48:46PM -0400, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> When vile is linked against ncursesw, version 5.9 64-bit in this case, it
> chews up the CPU when highlighting is enabled.

In a quick check with my Debian7, I don't see a problem.
(I used the CHANGES file as something to highlight).
> I don't need to link with ncursesw it's just something that I figured
> should work since it's noted to be compatible.
> Let me know if there's any other information I can provide.


        a) which system are you running on (so I can check the package)?
        b) what's your .vilerc look like?
        c) can you reproduce this with a small text file?

Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]