Re: [PATCH 1/1] Yet another go at tramp-handle-process-file, with proper scope for tramp-process-inhibit-flush

[Julian Scheid]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Michael Albinus<address@hidden> wrote:
> I've committed the patch. However, there are some small changes I did
> apply:
>
> tramp-process-inhibit-flush is now process-file-side-effects, according
> to the discussion on emacs-devel. And it is not declared in Tramp, so we
> must reenable your check of the existence of this variable.
>
> You have replaced tramp-get-connection-buffer by tramp-get-buffer. I
> confess that, for synchronous processes, both return the same buffer
> today, but this might change. So I'd like to keep tramp-get-connection-buffer.

Both make sense, thanks for the commit.

Julian