Re: Tramp 2.1.9

[Pete Forman]

At 2007-04-12 15:21 +0200, Michael Albinus wrote:
> For the inode number we could apply the same trick as we have
> for the date: treat it as real number, and convert later. Could you,
> please, check whether the appended patch works for you?

I've done the first two changes in the patch already and it seems to
work.

Shouldn't the third change keep the high bits, resulting in something
like this?

  ;; Convert inode.
  (unless (listp (nth 10 attr))
    (setcar (nthcdr 10 attr)
            (list (floor (nth 10 attr) 65536)
                  (floor (mod (nth 10 attr) 65536)))))


--
Pete Forman                -./\.-  Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco                  -./\.-   by myself and does not represent
address@hidden    -./\.-   the opinion of Schlumberger or
http://petef.port5.com           -./\.-   WesternGeco.