[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The state QSO Party thread [CO QP files]

From: Nate Bargmann
Subject: Re: The state QSO Party thread [CO QP files]
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 22:12:49 -0500

* On 2021 06 Sep 14:43 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> The WYSIWYG multiplier method was confused by the fact I was entering
> two values in the exchange field--the other op's name and county.  If I
> worked another station in the same county WYSIWYG counted it as a new
> mult.

I may have avoided some of the pain had I taken the advice of the RULES
section of the man page and did more prior testing.  My outcome may have
been different had I used the NO_RST option in my rules file.  I shall
keep that in mind for the future.

I guess it pays (eventually) to edit the documentation.  ;-)

73, Nate

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]