[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rethinking the need for CT compatible mode

From: Nate Bargmann
Subject: Re: Rethinking the need for CT compatible mode
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:06:23 -0600
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716

* On 2020 12 Jan 16:17 -0600, Fred Siegmund wrote:
> I use it for the german XMAS contest. As this is a sprint, where you have to
> leave QRG after CQ, I don't like ESM (and changing between CQ and S&P all
> the time).

Hi Fred.

Do you use the + and Insert keys?  Their mapping was reversed from CT
for a long, long time and I switched their mapping in the Git master
branch (post 1.4.0).

Would the following from my OP meet your needs, particularly the action
of Enter?

> > > > In its place I would consider adding support for the apostrophe " ' "
> > > > to send the CQ_TU_MSG or S&P_TU_MSG.
> > > > 
> > > > I would consider providing a :CFG keyword or keystroke combination
> > > > to toggle Enter from ESM to a mode where with the call field empty
> > > > Enter sends MYCALL and otherwise would only log a QSO when both the
> > > > call and exchange fields are populated depending on validation.

73, Nate


"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]