[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking the need for CT compatible mode
From: |
Nate Bargmann |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking the need for CT compatible mode |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:06:23 -0600 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
* On 2020 12 Jan 16:17 -0600, Fred Siegmund wrote:
> I use it for the german XMAS contest. As this is a sprint, where you have to
> leave QRG after CQ, I don't like ESM (and changing between CQ and S&P all
> the time).
Hi Fred.
Do you use the + and Insert keys? Their mapping was reversed from CT
for a long, long time and I switched their mapping in the Git master
branch (post 1.4.0).
Would the following from my OP meet your needs, particularly the action
of Enter?
> > > > In its place I would consider adding support for the apostrophe " ' "
> > > > to send the CQ_TU_MSG or S&P_TU_MSG.
> > > >
> > > > I would consider providing a :CFG keyword or keystroke combination
> > > > to toggle Enter from ESM to a mode where with the call field empty
> > > > Enter sends MYCALL and otherwise would only log a QSO when both the
> > > > call and exchange fields are populated depending on validation.
73, Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature