[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang
From: |
Vincent Lefevre |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Nov 2024 15:28:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.13+77 (9dc98409) vl-169878 (2024-06-20) |
On 2024-11-21 17:13:56 +0100, grischka via Tinycc-devel wrote:
> On 11/21/24 14:39, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> > Thanks fo reply !
> >
> > Again even if it's valid C code it's clear that it has several drawbacks
> > pointed so far by other comments on this thread and if there is a more
> > clean/clear/elegant way to express it why not talk/try it out ?
>
> For sure the drawback is that it will stop to work when tcc reaches
> 0.9.100 say in the year 2240 (given a release cycle of 3 years on
> average ;)
OK, so you plan to stick to 0.9.x for ever?
FYI, the issue was more the change of one of the first two numbers
(in which case, x would probably go back to a single digit, which
does not work either).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, avih, 2024/11/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2024/11/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, avih, 2024/11/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/11/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, grischka, 2024/11/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang,
Vincent Lefevre <=
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang, Vincent Lefevre, 2024/11/21