Re: [Tinycc-devel] Warning/bug detected by clang

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote in
 <cf92e478-cdb6-57ae-63a8-eae5f123ab57@gmail.com>:
 |Thanks fo reply !
 |
 |Again even if it's valid C code it's clear that it has several drawbacks 
 |pointed so far by other comments on this thread and if there is a more 
 |clean/clear/elegant way to express it why not talk/try it out ?

Yes.  After having used the x+y syntax ever since i, well,
understood pointers (it was a happy day!!) i "just recently",
i had to look, but very likely not before 2020, came to the &x[y]
syntax *generally* (used it here and there, also for the reason of
being in-sync) after having seen "the very great ones" where using
that in the 70s (iirc).  (And to mention that the x+y caused
problems like the subject in the past, whereas &x[y] "always"
worked (for me).)  (Off-topic, but hey -- all that stupid, use a
memory-safe language, or rust (eh, rest) in hell!  Says the wind.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
|
|And in Fall, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s ball(s).
|
|The banded bear
|without a care,
|Banged on himself fore'er and e'er
|
|Farewell, dear collar bear