Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

[Elijah Stone]

Atomics are here now; I think the only thing missing is 
wide-chars/strings, no?

I have a patch to support a number of c11/c2x features (including 
widestrings), but the last time I posted it on this list I was met with 
crickets, so I am not sure what else to do with it (aside from continuing 
to use it for myself).

 -E

On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Christian Jullien wrote:

> I’m big fan of constexpr in C++ that allows compile time computations and more 
> code elimination. I probably overuse constexpr in my code.
>
> I’m not sure that the nature of tcc will find a big impact with constexpr 
> support.
>
> There are many missing C11 features that should be handled before this one.
>
>  
>
> M2c
>
>  
>
> From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange.fr@nongnu.org] On 
> Behalf Of Marcus Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:36
> To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?
>
>  
>
> There's a new proposal to add it, and the standard is especially interested in 
> hearing from small compiler devs their opinions on such a feature.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2851.pdf