[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

From: Elijah Stone
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 16:09:04 -0700 (PDT)

Atomics are here now; I think the only thing missing is wide-chars/strings, no?

I have a patch to support a number of c11/c2x features (including widestrings), but the last time I posted it on this list I was met with crickets, so I am not sure what else to do with it (aside from continuing to use it for myself).


On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Christian Jullien wrote:

I’m big fan of constexpr in C++ that allows compile time computations and more 
code elimination. I probably overuse constexpr in my code.

I’m not sure that the nature of tcc will find a big impact with constexpr 

There are many missing C11 features that should be handled before this one.




From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange.fr@nongnu.org] On 
Behalf Of Marcus Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:36
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?


There's a new proposal to add it, and the standard is especially interested in 
hearing from small compiler devs their opinions on such a feature.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]