[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] stdatomic: ld/st/xchg/cmpxchg on simple types

From: Dmitry Selyutin
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] stdatomic: ld/st/xchg/cmpxchg on simple types
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:09:03 +0300

Actually, why don't you try to use just the normal tcc function parser?

It knows how to type-check arguments, it knows how to assign the correct
return type, it knows how to call functions according to ABI conventions
on Linux and Windows as well, and it knows how to pass small structs in

Can this be apted to case where we dynamically determine the type of the function to be called, and when the same function can be called with actually different (though binary compatible) arguments? I haven't find the code which fits my needs; if there's one, I'm OK with adopting it.

All what you're trying to reinvent, for what reason?

Please share a concrete example where tcc parses a generic function, like it has to be done with atomics.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]