[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] whatever (was: (no subject))

From: Michael Matz
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] whatever (was: (no subject))
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 00:32:26 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)

Hello Andy,

On Fri, 10 May 2019, ANDY TAKKER wrote:

A lot of words are said about compatibility and portability, but GCC
and PCC bring one result, and TCC is completely different.

Sure.  I'm assuming that's not a problem for you.

Here is another interesting link closely related to the TCC. https://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=2524.0

That seems to be about nasm, not TCC.

                nop <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
                jmp       L8D <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
                jmp       L8D <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yes, TCC is a non-optimizing single-pass compiler. The price to pay for this is non-optimal code.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]