[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] _Generic or __builtin_choose_expr

From: David Mertens
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] _Generic or __builtin_choose_expr
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:03:38 -0400

I would like to look carefully at this. I tried looking at the diff between the master and the generic branch on your github repo, but it looked like a whole lot of extraneous stuff was included. Let me know after you've had a chance to merge your github's master branch into your generic branch. Then I'll try to take a look at it.

Not that I'm the world's greatest expert or anything, but I want to see how this might impact my symtab stuff. :-)


On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:51 AM, uso ewin <address@hidden> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Petr Skočík <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there any plans for C11's _Generic or at least __builtin_choose_expr?
> Best regards,
> Petr Skocik
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


I was working on _Generic implementation on tcc(as an hobby)
Your mail made me want to continue my job, and yesterday I've succeed
to make something usable:

The code as it is actually is pretty crappy, doesn't respect C
standard(main difference is I can't make difference between a char*,
an int * or any kind of pointer), but should be enough for most use
case, and pretty easy to merge on mob

should I try to merge it to mob once I've clean my commits ?
maybe by adding some option like: "--with-fake-generic" ?
So _Generic are not enable by default


Tinycc-devel mailing list

 "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
  Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
  by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]