[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] patches for discussion

From: Michael Matz
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] patches for discussion
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 05:35:09 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)


[I'm currently having problems getting mails through to the GNU mail server, sorry if you get this multiple times]

On Fri, 13 May 2016, Sergey Korshunoff wrote:

I have the following patches in github repo (requests in tinycc bugzilla):

+ memory model macros __{L,}LP64__

Please push to mob.

+ short_call_convention https://github.com/seyko2/tinycc/commit/558614d3f822de03bb6267f47a24487faa69d29a

This is okay as well. A bit ugly, and potentially a problem on other archs as well.

+ --whole-archive support https://github.com/seyko2/tinycc/commit/65e42df4d0fedb340f42652bb49fdacc7bc3e05c

In principle I have nothing against including this feature, but I don't like the actual implementation; it's got too much churn. Instead add a new flag in the TCCState structure, set it when seeing --whole-archive, unset it when seeing --no-whole-archive and test it in tcc_load_alacarte. The whole patch including docu shouldn't need more than 30 lines and no changes in function signatures.

PS: there is request (Bugzilla) to implement
bug #37244: tinycc: lacks -nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs support, needed by Wine

Hmm? tcc already has -nostdlib disabling automatic inclusion of the crt files and the C library. The bug report is meanwhile bogus.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]