Re: [Tinycc-devel] c extensions

[mobi phil]

P.S.

what would be yet even more complicated but interesting is to add a kind of 2 phase compile, where the "head" of the tcc parser would be able to parse the "translated" (or pre-parsed code) code the same way as it does with the macro expansion.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, mobi phil <address@hidden> wrote:

Domingo,

thanks for your quick answer. Please note that one of the reason I want to stay tcc is:

-> the speed and relative simplicity, this is probably the reason keeps all of you close to tcc

-> I want to stay C syntax. Do not want to invent another language. Want just to embed constructs to the existing language.

so for these reasons things like lex/yacc, vala etc. are out of question.

Had a look at the other links as well, but they are far from what I want.

I would love to see C evolving without the "dictated by committee syndrome" (or whatsoever is

the pejorative) and tcc would be probably a nice opportunity to experiment.

mobi phil

--
rgrds,
mobi phil

being mobile, but including technology
http://mobiphil.com