[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Using clang
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Using clang |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:26:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Le vendredi 15 février 2013 13:39:57, grischka a écrit :
> You wrote:
> > fixed pasto in in 108b2876; background for the additional $CC test is:
> > GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc (but i.e. clang, which (as
> > of 3.1) requires an addtional CFLAG to accept the non portable (gnuisms
> > all over the place; try to cimpile tcc with Sun^HOracle, Intel,
> > Pathscale, ... compiler) code).
>
> Using "-fheinous-gnu-extensions" for clang makes sense but I still
> don't see how "GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc"???
I suppose like for tinycc, lots of code out there test GCC_MAJOR and GCC_MINOR
for available features so other compilers with good compatibility with gcc
have no choice but to pretend to be gcc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --- grischka
Best regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.