tinycc-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux


From: Ramsay Jones
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:55:23 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
>> Le mercredi 13 février 2013 19:08:37, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
>>> Le mercredi 13 février 2013 17:16:28, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
>>>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:30:14 -0700, address@hidden wrote:
>>>>> "Thomas Preud'homme" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> Why not but strike multiarch from that as I don't see how we could
>>>>>> detect it by compiling a C program.
>>>>>
>>>>> Use the output of ldd to tell you where the C library is.
>>>>
>>>> Yep true, I thought about it last night and forgot about it in the
>>>> morning. However I just pushed a commit using checking where is crti.o
>>>> before reading your mail. It's a one line test so I think the solution
>>>> is not too bad but you can prove me wrong of course.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Thinking about it a bit I managed to come
>>> up with a much better patch. It's not totally done though but I have to
>>> leave. I'll push it tonight. Stay tuned.
>>
>> Pushed. And the diffstat from the original situation (before my 2 commits to 
>> reorganize) is also better. See for yourself:
>>
> 
> OK, despite what I said, I fetched commit e298f608 ("Create config-print
> program to test $cc", 13-02-2013) last night in order to test it.
> [Sorry for not reporting the results last night, but I desperately
> needed to get some sleep!]
> 
> Unfortunately, the news is not good! :( Using ldd has broken the build
> again and my x86 is apparently a bigendian machine! :-P
> 

So, having tested commit b9f089fc ("Don't search libgcc_s.so.1 on /lib64",
14-02-2013), this is all fixed now.

Thanks!

ATB,
Ramsay Jones






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]