[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux
From: |
grischka |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:52:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Oh crap. Can you tell me whether there is still a libc.so.6 in /lib?
If yes, then I could replace the ldd call by something like ls
/lib/**/libc.so.6 (of course it would not be ** since it's not bourne shell)
Don't know right now but it works fine without anything set,
just from the defaults in tcc.h. Anyway I'd suggest to stay
conservative for now. That is to make a more or less static
assumption about mulitarch. For example you could add the code
that you had in tcc.h previously, into conftest.c, such as
case 't':
printf("TRIPLET_ARCH "-" TRIPLET_OS "-" TRIPLET_ABI\n");
break;
Or you do still something with ldd and sed but it's risky.
In any case, then check whether the guess does make sense, for
example whether there is
/usr/lib/guessed-MUA/crt1.o.
If not, just do nothing. Exept on old x86_64, you could
set lddir=lib64 if it exists.
Previously we handled this cases in Makefile:
"i386-linux-gnu"
"i386-kfreebsd-gnu"
"i386-gnu"
"lib64"
"x86_64-linux-gnu"
"x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu"
"arm-linux-gnueabi"
"arm-linux-gnueabihf"
Which seemed to have worked for everyone except for the empty
MUA-dir case from the OP (Ramsay).
--- grischka
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, grischka, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, grischka, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, grischka, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux,
grischka <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, grischka, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, grischka, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: test failure on Linux, Christian JULLIEN, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: test failure on Linux, Christian JULLIEN, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] test failure on Linux, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/14