On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Michael Matz <
address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2012, Karl Skomski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I discovered tinycc some days ago but only today I discovered the
>> current development repository:
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git It's
>> not that easy to find the most-updated tinycc repository.
>>
>> I thought maybe it would be nice to switch the tinycc repository to a
>> github organization?
>
>
> How exactly would that help spreading interest (except in github)?
>
> Apart from that: does github have kind of like mob branches by default? Because, quite frankly, that's the only reason I contributed anything, however small, back to tinycc. If it hadn't I still would have had fun for a weekend fixing tcc, just without anybody gaining anything from it, as my patches would have never seen anybody else, and nobody would have seen them.
>
>> Higher google rank,
>
>
> Huh? So you think google is giving points for github, but not for
repo.or.cz (the best), or gitorious or any of the others? Proof?
>
>> nice readme,
>
>
> Doesn't write itself, no matter the VCS. So how does a new VCS magically help?
>
>> easier collaborating,
>
>
> How exactly easier than today?
>
>> easier forks
>
>
> Well, I'm not exactly fluent in git (actually I hate its usability, which is next to non-existent), but what's difficult with "git checkout -b"?
>
>> etc.
>
>
> Aha.
>
>
> Ciao,
> Michael.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
>
address@hidden
>
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel