[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Several patchs from Debian packaging]

From: Thomas Preud'homme
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Several patchs from Debian packaging]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:04:00 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-3-686; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; )

On Sunday 18 April 2010 19:46:42 mobi phil wrote:
> Hello...
> >> > [P|47abdbd] Better handle ld scripts
> >> > * search file from INPUT and GROUP commands in the library path in
> >> > addition to the current directory
> >> > * handle libraries specified by -lfoo options
> >> > * Search lib in GROUP command repeatedly
> I understand that this patch still not provides -L path overrides? I was
> writing an email that contrary to other linkers -L DOES NOT override the
> hardcoded /prefix/usr/lib and /prefix/lib
Does others compilers really make -L override the search path for libraries ? 
Because to me when I add a -L gcc is still able to load libc.so and all the 
libraries this ld script links.

But to answer your question, indeed this patch doesn't change this behavior.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]