[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Addresses of variables

From: Timo
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Addresses of variables
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:51:27 +0300
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20100317)

Alexei wrote:
Isn't it a BUG?

#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
  int first;
  int second;
  printf("&first=%08X &second=%08X",&first,&second);
  return 0;
&first=0012FF94 &second=0012FF90

What exactly do you think is a bug? If you think, that it is a bug to allocate variable 'first' in a higher address than the variable 'second', you are wrong. Compiler is free to allocate variables as it wishes. Actually it would have been free *not* to allocate them at all if you didn't take the addresses of them.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]