[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Buiding binutils 2.17 (needs dynamic arrays).

From: Rob Landley
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Buiding binutils 2.17 (needs dynamic arrays).
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:15:55 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6

On Thursday 04 October 2007 1:05:25 am Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:49:44PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > The draft standard I have is 1.5 megabytes of ascii text (ok, html) that
> > reads like it was written by lawyers.  I use it to break ties, not as an
> > implementation guide.
> Written by language lawyers, sure.  And tiebreaking is what I meant. :)
> > The reason nobody's apparently noticed that tcc doesn't complain about a
> > function returning a function before is because when you feed it legal
> > code it works.  Making it complain properly when fed illegal code is a
> > luxury, which I'll implement if it doesn't bloat it too much.
> There's nothing wrong with that attitude.  Still, I haven't looked at
> your branch lately, but I hope it's not claiming C99 compliance or even
> the intent to become C99 compliant in that case :)

I dunno, is gcc claiming c99 compliance?

"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]