[Tinycc-devel] Unsubscribe

[Norman Winer]

Unsubscribe
end


--- address@hidden wrote:

> Send Tinycc-devel mailing list submissions to
>       address@hidden
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
>       address@hidden
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       address@hidden
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tinycc-devel digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Some feedback (Ivan Popov)
>    2. Re: Fwd: Bug#322913: tcc: _Bool exists but
> doesn't       comply
>       with C99 (Romain Francoise)
>    3. Re: Some feedback (Fabrice Bellard)
>    4. Re: [patch] Segmentation fault compiling
> broken 1-liner
>       (Fabrice Bellard)
>    5. CVS compilation is broken (Marcelo Jimenez)
>    6. Re: tcc 0.9.23 shift generation bug (Fabrice
> Bellard)
>    7. make test fails with gcc 4 (Marcelo Jimenez)
>    8. Re: tcc 0.9.23 shift generation bug (Zdenek
> Pavlas)
>    9. tcctest.c fails on Windows (Sven Oliver Moll)
>   10. Re: tcctest.c fails on Windows (David A.
> Wheeler)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:18:36 +0200
> From: Ivan Popov <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Some feedback
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID:
>
<address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:16:14PM -0700, Daniel P.
> Stasinski wrote:
> > Make it a compile time option that rather than
> exec the code by
> > jumping to it in memory, instead write it to a tmp
> file, execlp() it,
> > delete the tmp file and return the status.
> 
> I'd rather do the decision at runtime, if that is at
> all possible,
> as execution in memory is not only faster / more
> efficient / less error prone
> but also works on systems without an elf exec
> loader.
> 
> My 2c,
> --
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:59:10 +0200
> From: Romain Francoise <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fwd: Bug#322913: tcc:
> _Bool exists but
>       doesn't comply with C99
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Marcelo Jimenez <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Index: tcc.c
> >
>
===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvsroot/tinycc/tinycc/tcc.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.172
> > diff -u -r1.172 tcc.c
> > --- tcc.c   17 Jun 2005 22:05:58 -0000      1.172
> > +++ tcc.c   30 Aug 2005 05:23:36 -0000
> > @@ -5822,6 +5822,7 @@
> >              /* we handle char/short/etc... with
> generic code */
> >              if (dbt != (VT_INT | VT_UNSIGNED) &&
> >                  dbt != (VT_LLONG | VT_UNSIGNED)
> &&
> > +                dbt != VT_BOOL &&
> >                  dbt != VT_LLONG)
> >                  dbt = VT_INT;
> >              if (c) {
> > @@ -5836,6 +5837,10 @@
> >                      case VT_DOUBLE: vtop->c.ui =
> (unsigned
> > int)vtop->c.d; break;
> >                      case VT_LDOUBLE: vtop->c.ui =
> (unsigned
> > int)vtop->c.d; break;
> >                      }
> > +                    break;
> > +           case VT_BOOL:
> > +                    vpushi(0);
> > +                    gen_op(TOK_NE);
> >                      break;
> >                  default:
> >                      /* int case */
> 
> Thanks, that does the trick indeed.
> 
> -- 
>   ,''`.
>  : :' :        Romain Francoise
> <address@hidden>
>  `. `'         http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
>    `-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:17:11 +0200
> From: Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Some feedback
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> format=flowed
> 
> Filip Navara wrote:
> > Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
> > 
> >> On 9/1/05, Marcelo Jimenez
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>  
> >>
> >>> Daniel, did you see the patch I wrote about
> exec-shield? I have FC4
> >>> and -run does not segfault. Try as root:
> >>>   
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, I have an idea.  Please tell me if it's a bad
> idea but it will get
> >> the -run option to work regardless of
> exec-shield.  I tested it with a
> >> quick dirty proof of concept hack.
> >>
> >> Make it a compile time option that rather than
> exec the code by
> >> jumping to it in memory, instead write it to a
> tmp file, execlp() it,
> >> delete the tmp file and return the status.
> >>  
> >>
> > Isn't just pure "mprotect" usable?
> 
> Yes it is. I am commiting a small patch for that...
> 
> Fabrice.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 23:08:52 +0200
> From: Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] [patch] Segmentation
> fault compiling
>       broken 1-liner
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> format=flowed
> 
> Marcelo Jimenez wrote:
> > On 8/31/05, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> >>>The missing () on main does however make it very
> invalid C.
> >>
> >>That's just a syntax violation.
> 
=== message truncated ===


905-471-6659 voice
905-471-8428 fax