From: address@hidden
Reply-To: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Tftb-help Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
Date: 13 Jun 2006 01:42:58 -0700
Send Tftb-help mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tftb-help
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Tftb-help digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. tfrsp doubt (fwd) (Eric Chassande-Mottin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:38:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eric Chassande-Mottin <address@hidden>
Subject: [Tftb-help] tfrsp doubt (fwd)
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
hi,
your observation is related to finite size effects. we analyze signals of
finite duration. to compute a TFR, you need to decide what to do at the
boundaries. most (if not all) routines of the TFTB (including tfrsp)
assume that the signal is zero beyond the boundaries.
consequently, from the definition of a short-term Fourier analysis,
http://gdr-isis.org/tftb/tutorial/node34.html the signal selected by the
analysis window when it is centered around a point near a boundary is
partly zero. at t=0, half of the right hand part of the windowed signal is
zero. we see less signal, thus the spectrogram amplitude decreases.
if you are not satisfied by this, you may like to consider TFRs which
conserves the support of the signal (i.e., which are zero when the signal
is zero). see Flandrin, Time-frequency/time-scale analysis, Academic Press
for more details on this point.
bye, e.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:27:52 +0800
Subject: tfrsp doubt
Hi,Eric,
I found one probelm in tfrsp.m.
If I enter:"sig=fmlin(128,0.1,0.4); tfrsp(sig);" in Matlab commend,I get
one
plot as per attached file.
Based on this signal, tfr should be at time 0 ->normalised frequency is
0.1,
whereas, time 128->freq 0.4.
But how come appear weak energy value at the time 0 and time 128 in the
plot?
Is it dealed properly?How to see the energy value exactly cut at
location(0,
0.1) and (128, 0.4)?
Thanks,
Joc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: prob.doc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 32256 bytes
Desc:
Url :
http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/tftb-help/attachments/20060613/b06887ff/prob.obj
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tftb-help mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tftb-help
End of Tftb-help Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
***************************************