|
From: | Karl Hegbloom |
Subject: | Re: [Texmacs-dev] debian packages of texmacs |
Date: | Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:46:54 +0000 |
They lured me here with a fancy dream job offer, out of college, so I've not finished my degree, then "let me go" after behind the scenes meddlers decided I wanted to go back to restaurant wage slavery. They deliberately ruined all of my plans and now they want me to waste my time trying to establish yet another supreme court case law precedent they won't follow any way. The same culture that pretends infant genital mutilation and conscription are legal locked me in jail for attempted benign communication with my son's abusive and perjuous mother.
Attached is another source of their jealously, a legal document produced using TeXmacs, prior to my creation of the integration with Juris-M for managing citations. It explains some of the above in more detail, complaining about the court ignoring evidence, a complaint they are trying to ignore again.
I will put time into learning Guile when I can. It's my preferred time-sink.
Hi all,On 05 Jun 2016, at 19:05, Karl Hegbloom <address@hidden> wrote:Work was begun but not completed. I want to help complete it but have other obligations right now so can't spend full time on it. I'm also not necessarily the most qualified in terms of knowledge and experience, but will try. The work that was done is on a branch in my git clone, on github. It was a long time ago.
I think that we should go straight to Guile 2.2.
To me the stumbling block seems that we need to rewrite some scheme bootstrap code to accomodate the new compile/eval model. TeXmacs introduces a custom module system which Guile 2 does not like much. I’m not fluent enough to fix this. All the rest of the scheme code should not pose big problems. Also on C++ side there should not be many changes needed.Karl, what is the status of your modifications?BestMax______________________________________________________________________________________________On Sun, Jun 5, 2016, 02:45 Ingolf Schaefer <address@hidden> wrote:Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016, 10:26:34 schrieb kamaraju kusumanchi:
> I see that my name is mentioned in the maintainers of Debian package
> of texmacs - http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/download/linux.en.html#debian
> . Could you please remove it? I stopped maintaining it a while ago. In
> fact, Texmacs is removed from Debian unstable due to dependency on
> guile-1.8 (Debian has moved to guile-2.0) and lack of maintainer
> [1],[2].
>
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797833
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825252
>
> thanks
> raju
Hi,
I can confirm that a similar discussion is happening in Mageia community. I'm
afraid that this will come for other Linux distributions as well in future.
Is there any progress on a port to a recent Guile or another recent scheme
dialect?
Yours,
Ingolf
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
Texmacs-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
2016-04-20_160901179_Answer_to_Motions_of_Respondent_for_Summary_Judgements_with_Exhibits.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |