Re: [Texmacs-dev] modularity of math editor

[Lukasz Stafiniak]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Carter, Nathan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it is very modular. You take TeXmacs, and you have the editor,
>> without additional dependencies.
>>
>> I'm sorry for this joke ;-)
>
> Hehe.  Maybe this means I need to clarify my original question.
>
> By "math editor" I mean *not* the document editor, but specifically that 
> portion of it that edits mathematical formulas.  Or perhaps it's all the same 
> widget?  If I'm not asking the right questions, feel free to correct me.
>

I think a meaningful separation would be a major effort, but I'm not a
developer so we better wait for their answer.
It is still valuable to consider this although (or even if) a modular
design would be worse than an integrated design.