[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question

From: Ralf Treinen
Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:06:09 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:45:06PM +0700, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> > > I use jpeg2ps (http://www.pdflib.com/products/more/jpeg2ps.html). It 
> > > produces the most compact .eps files - it just inlines jpeg image (this 
> > > is allowed by PostScript, and ghostscript understands this).
> > Unfortunately, this does not seem to be standard,
> > since it is not on my computer (full installation of RedHat 9.0). 
> > Is there something more standard than that ?
> Well, the choice is not very large. There is jpeg2ps (if you want rpm, it 
> lives at rpm.livna.org, because the package is not quite free software, 
> though it can be used for free). By the way, jpeg2ps *is* in Gentoo Linux 
> (which I'm using), it's also in debian non-free.  There is also imgtops2 

dependency of texmacs on a non-free library would cause a problem
for debian, and for other distributions probably too. Besides, I cannot
find in debian. What is the exact name of the package?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]