[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support
From: |
Nix N. Nix |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support |
Date: |
23 Apr 2003 11:00:34 -0600 |
No.
Having TeXmacs calculate the width of the figure is a bad idea, because
LaTeX might not calculate the same width. After all, LaTeX typesets
things differently than TeXmacs, right ?
I don't understand why floating figures and tables are so generic as to
allow the user to type text into a place within the figure other than
the caption. A figure should only allow the linking or embedding of a,
well, figure, like EPS, etc., and a table should come pre-configured
with a tabular and a caption, /and that's it/, no room for
extra-caption, intra-figure text.
This way, we don't have to worry about eccentric figures containing the
memoirs of some guy or an entire Shakespearian play, and it doesn't take
away from what I think is the original intention behind floating figures
and tables, namely to have floating figures and tables.
I don't think we should change the way figures and tables are
represented in the tree, but we should guarantee that the contents of a
figure is always a graphic, and only a graphic, with a possibly empty,
but always present caption, and the contents of a floating table is
always a single tabular environment, again, with a caption as qualified
above.
This, I think could be safely run through (tmtex ...) twice - even a
large table. Unfortunately, the LaTeX would look very ugly so, if you
can think of a LaTeX way to designate a part of a document by a single,
unique ID, and have it referenceed later by that ID, that would be
great. Here's what I mean:
\begin{table-contents}[1009291]
\begin{tabular}[llll]
a && b && c && d \\
e && f && g && h
\end{tabular}
\end{table-contents}
\begin{minipage}[h]{\widthof{\display{table-contents}[1009291]}}
\begin{center}
\display{table-contents}[1009291]
\captionof{table}{The first 8 letters of the alphabet}
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
Do you know of a LaTeX construct that does that ? I will look through
"The LaTeX companion". This is almost like "include", but not from a
file.
- [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/22
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, david, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/23
- [Texmacs-dev] More information to export filters (was: Multiple column support), david, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support,
Nix N. Nix <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support (pathological example), Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/23
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Multiple column support, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/23