[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Texmacs-dev] [Announce] nogencc-0.7

From: Joris van der Hoeven
Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] [Announce] nogencc-0.7
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:38:02 +0200 (MET DST)

> Oops, you should have pasted that on #texmacs
> dlopen() and the other listed functions do dynamic linking of
> libraries!

> That's seems reasonnable you can't use dynamic linking
> functions when using static linking.

Dynamic linking maybe very useful for linking computer algebra
systems (or later, things like imlib) after static linking.

> But the twist is this does not
> belong to TeXmacs code but to the Guile library.  I don't know if you
> can compile Guile without dynamic linking. And like

David might try another version of guile, like 1.4.

> Anyway, If some platform impose on us static linking, if it has
> Guile it will have it compiled statically (if possible).
> Also static linking reduces the options for a client to connect to
> TeXmacs.

Yes, both static and dynamic linking have adavantages and drawbacks
as pointed out in the previous messages.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]