[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problematic node name characters
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: problematic node name characters |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:32:59 GMT |
I have done nothing for index entries (both index and node name) and
listoffloats entries for now. Do you want the same warnings as in
menus?
The problematic constructs are just as problematic in indexes, right?
An index entry is a menu item. Unless we're talking about different
things.
It is index entries that people complained about most vociferously in
the past. E.g., if one is documenting cplusplus::functions, using that
natural/correct name is the only reasonable way to index them, and it
could easily be happening automatically, e.g., in an @ftable.
karl