[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.

From: Patrice Dumas
Subject: Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:19:55 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 04:08:16PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> Sure, braces involving @-commands have to be properly matching.
> That is fine.  But what about when @-commands aren't involved?
> E.g., I think:
> @html
> {
> @end html
> should be valid.  Otherwise "raw" loses its meaning.  Do you agree?

What I can easily do is to pass lone { and } unmodified when they are
right below the raw command, but if within an @-command matching 
braces are considered.

Is it right?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]