[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <h1> vs. <h2>
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: <h1> vs. <h2> |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:18:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:58:14PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> while h5 is smaller than text
>
> Still? I thought current browsers had fixed that stupidity left over
> from the early days. No one would want a header smaller than the
> text size, completely illogical.
At least in firefox (iceweasel) 3.5.16.
> MAX_HEADER_LEVEL
> which would determine the highest level.
>
> I like that idea. I think it's the right way to go, and it should be 4
> by default, because in practice no one wants headers smaller than text.
Agreed.
> HEADER_LEVEL_MODIFIER
> to modify the level prior from outputting the h?.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "modify". A conf variable to explicitly
> specify the top-level <h> value seems like the simplest thing to
> understand to me (maybe we already have it?).
Ok.
> And I think it should be
> 2 by default, since most manuals are relatively small, and because that
> is existing practice.
Maybe 2 in the default case and 1 when in texi2html mode.
> Big manuals like Texinfo and Emacs could set it to 1 if they wish,
> although I suspect in practice they won't care. (I don't recall anyone
> ever writing the list saying "how to make my chapter headers use
> <h1>"...)
Well, in my opinion it is especially in the case of split by chapter
manuals that it looks better, and since makeinfo couldn't do that...
Anyway 2 as the default lowest level is fine by me.
--
Pat