Re: proposals for new XML

[Karl Berry]

    So no commandarg for +, ok?

I'm confused again.  I was thinking of commandarg="..." as the literal
string given to @itemize, not anything parsed.  Otherwise, why have it
in some cases (@minus) and not others (+)?

I understand (I think :) how there has to be an element too, regardless,
with the structure of the argument, for those uncommon instances where
it exists.

    I am actually asking whether
    the Texinfo XML should conform to that tree too...  So I guess this is 
    a yes :-)

Yes.