[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)

From: Dr. Werner Fink
Subject: Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:39:58 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Werner Fink]
> >> IMHO we should not use PAM in sulogin without any fallback
> >> otherwise we'd run into trouble in case of having en error in the
> >> PAM configuration.
> I agree.
> > Attached I've a patch which uses PAM to update the lastlog file in
> > case of a dead PAM user session.  Should we apply this one?
> Right now, I believe we should wrap up what we got and make a new
> release, and look at the PAM stuff for the next release.

OK, just do it.  The last change was a bug fix from
Fedora about SELinux in sulogin.  The possible patch
for PAM lastlog support is now part in the contrib


  "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
          a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]