[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)

From: Dr. Werner Fink
Subject: Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:55:26 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:24:08PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Dr. Werner Fink]
> > OK, tested it out and had done some changes.  The file
> > /etc/pam.d/init is required otherwise the logon is not possible.
> Why not change the pam_start() call to use "login" instead of "init",
> to avoid the need for a new pam configuration file?
> Btw, why is the pam stuff in init.c, and not in sulogin.c?

IMHO we should not use PAM in sulogin without any fallback
otherwise we'd run into trouble in case of having en error
in the PAM configuration.


  "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
          a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]