[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Swftools-common] basic question on ActionScript 2.0

From: Pablo Rodríguez
Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] basic question on ActionScript 2.0
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:56:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

On 10/30/2013 09:49 AM, Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:50:40 +0100 Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
>> On 10/28/2013 10:49 PM, John Sullivan wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Use .include from the main .sc to incorporate those declarations
>>> into the final SWF.
> That is merely attempted obfuscation of the original time-line data.
> It doesn't exactly resolve the licensing issue.

Do you think it’s obfuscation? I think it’s only separation.

>>> Both the script and the main .sc remain unencumbered, the "end user"
>>> will need to provide their own source data to complete compilation.
>> Thank you very much for this, John (you make my day :-)).
> .. and the source data along with the result of the compilation using
> it, could be considered someone's artistic endeavour.
>> I think this can solve the issue (at least from the perspective of the
>> user).
> Does it?

Maybe (or perhaps) not. I have to analyze this.

But even if it doesn’t solve the problem, I think it would be easier to
write a GPL exception to this.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]