[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?

From: Andreas Haufler \(scireum\)
Subject: RE: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:42:24 +0200

Dear Alex,


that’s why I put the “1.0” in quotes. I don’t care if it is 0.9.x or 0.9.x.y.z or actually 1.0


I just had the experience that some bugs in 0.9.0 are already fixed in the git version. However, as normal, new ones where introduced. We’re just interested in a new stable (read: non crashing) release which makes the features and fixes accessible. So it’s all about coordination  J.


To answer Chris’ question: We could use google code. It’s free, it’s easy to use, provides a bug tracker and a wiki. However, I think Matthias should decide which way to go, since it’s basically his project.


best regards



freundliche Grüße
scireum GmbH

Andreas Haufler


scireum GmbH, Friedrichstr. 8, 70736 Fellbach

Tel: (0711) 69394632  -  E-Mail:   address@hidden
Fax: (0711) 69394635  -  Internet: http://www.scireum.de


Geschäftsführer: Michael Haufler, Andreas Haufler

Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 732171


From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Dr. Alex Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:03 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: Swftools
Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?


    I read Andreas' post to mean 'Stable' as in Debian ... as in unchanging, rather than 'Stable' as in always works (Debian does well on both meanings, but the notion of unchanging is what they really refer to).  He wants to test thoroughly and know what does / doesn't work, and know that those test results will still be valid next week, next month, ...

    But i may be crossing my wires. If my interpretation is correct, why not just pick the version 0.9.X as your 'stable' -  why does it need to be 1.0??


Dr. Alex Sheppard
Mob: 0775 1074054

Chris Pugh wrote:

On 21 April 2010 08:30, filip sound <address@hidden> wrote:
well, i have to say thanks for your indirect answer to my quite simple
question. my conclusion is that there is no next release planned for the
next weeks. you could have had it easier.
It stirred things up a bit though Filip didn't it? ;o)
But I have to beg to differ with you slightly.  The git repository
*IS* the latest
version.  Stability is relative, surely?   As you have stated, even the releases
labeled 'stable version' don't play well with all systems.    But hey, that
goes for nearly all software, from Open Source to the big expensive guns.
I can remember fighting  ( on someone's behalf ) with their sparkling new
purchase of 3dsMax from Autodesk.  It point blank refused to behave on
certain hardware under certain o/s, despite Autodesk's protestations to
the contrary.  Stable my eye!!  Did they care?  Did they ever! ;o)
Quit grumbling.  Enjoy what you have.  I'm sure your next 'stable' release,
which may or not work with 'your system' ( whatever that may be,  ) and
with lots of updated features  and bug fixes which also may or may not
work as intended, will be out very soon!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]