swarm-support
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ..


From: Marcus G. Daniels
Subject: Re: ..
Date: 23 Oct 1998 08:48:03 -0700

>>>>> "SF" == Sandor Fazekas <address@hidden> writes:

SF> If I'm right the new Swarm (>1.3) does not have 'setDefaultOrder'
SF> method for 'ActionGroup'. How is then possible to set
SF> 'Sequential', 'Randomized' or 'Concurrent' ? Is there any new
SF> support for this feature ?

There never was an implementation of this feature, so I removed it from the
interface (and thus the documentation).  Someone should implement it. 

SF> I might be wrong but it seems to me that if someone makes a probe
SF> for a method with '(void)' return value and 'calls' it by clicking
SF> on the right place then the whole Swarm system aborts. Changing
SF> the return value to anything else this behaviour dissapears. I
SF> also tried 'setHideResult' but it gave me the same result.

Could you please copy these reports to address@hidden  That way,
you can be sure they will be fixed.

                  ==================================
   Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
   to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
   [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
   with "help" in the body of the message.
                  ==================================


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]