[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: messages to nil
From: |
Rick Riolo |
Subject: |
Re: messages to nil |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:50:19 -0400 (EDT) |
Re:
> ...Maybe a GCC upgrade is in order?
Not something I like to hear!! ;-)
thanks for the info.
- r
Rick Riolo address@hidden
Program for Study of Complex Systems (PSCS)
4068 Randall Lab
University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
Phone: 313 763 3323 Fax: 313 763 9267
http://www.pscs.umich.edu/PEOPLE/rlr-home.html
On 22 Apr 1998, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Date: 22 Apr 1998 13:41:36 -0700
> From: Marcus G. Daniels <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: messages to nil
>
> >>>>> "RLR" == Rick Riolo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> RLR> One more question...can you remind
> RLR> me how I overide a function definition without having gcc give me
> RLR> a "duplicate symbols" error?
>
> I notice that in gcc-2.8.1 that there is a file devoted to nil_method,
> whereas in earlier versions it was a part of sendmsg.c.
>
> I'd guess that was done on purpose to avoid the linker problems you
> are having. Maybe a GCC upgrade is in order?
>
>
>
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
> ==================================
>
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================