[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time steps
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Time steps |
Date: |
31 Jul 2001 08:22:05 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "JG" == Jacek Gomoluch <address@hidden> writes:
JG> Alternatively, I could "discretise" my model in a way that one
JG> milliecond corresponds to one timestep (with large gaps in the
JG> simulation time where nothing is happening). Will the performance
JG> of the tool be degraded then ?
If it is possible to scale timesteps into a 32 bit integer, then I'd suggest
using this approach. Swarm collapses time, so sparseness won't be a problem
for memory size or performance.
A more elaborate `two tiered' approach can be seen below. This will
remove the range limitation.
http://www.santafe.edu/projects/swarm/archive/list-archive.0002/0152.html
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================