[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu soc status
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: gnu soc status |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:15:02 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Karl> Then there is the question of gdb. There are three gdb-related
Karl> projects, but they are all different, mentored by different people. Can
Karl> you gdb mentors please get together and figure out which one you think
Karl> is the most important? In the absence of a different consensus, gdb/mi
Karl> seems the most central to GNU to me.
There is only one gdb proposal, the one by Oguz.
The other two are actually Emacs projects.
Tom
- gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/09
- Re: gnu soc status, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/04/10
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: gnu soc status, Micah Cowan, 2009/04/10
- my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: gnu soc status, Sam Steingold, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, phcoder, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Bean, 2009/04/15