[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting f

From: Raffael Mancini
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:05:49 +0200

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:30 +0200, Lionel Flandrin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 02:03:35PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> > Michael Raskin <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > Shawn Betts wrote:
> > >>>> I like the sound of this: simple but effective.
> > >>> With our pace of the last years we don't even need to do anything
> > >>> special.. We should just ask people to report all regressions in git
> > >>> head "right now" and wait for a week without commits and without
> > >>> reports to handle left - it will come soon afterwards anyway..
> > >> 
> > >> That's how I've done it in the past. It works...
> > >
> > > Well, the idea is to make it more frequent.
> > 
> > Okay. Then let's keep the current model and just do the releases more
> > often. ;)
> > 
> > On a related matter: What about an 1.0 release in the mid-term future?
> > What would be _your_ wishlist for StumpWM 1.0?
>  For one: finish the "float" groups. It's really in alpha state right
> now. I don't use them myself but it's already halfway there and it's a
> good proof of concept for the new group "abstraction" layer which
> would make it possible to use different management modes for each
> group.

I've written a patch that enables you to interactively resize the
windows in float-group. I'll post it this evening if anyone is
interested. I've actually already tried to post it but somehow that git
email tool didn't work...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]