Re: [STUMP] [UPDATE]Re: Tag-based window management

[Julian Stecklina]

Michael Raskin <address@hidden> writes:

> Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
>>>> I guess, your X sends events which stumpwm doesn't understand. I have
>>>> relatively the same situation with virt-manager window.
>>> I doubt it. If that was the case, I would expect the effect to be
>>> persistent - as in Thunderbird temporary windows always get stuck. That
>>> is not the case, however. That looks more like "any temporary window has
>>> a fixed small probability of not disappearing".
>
>> I had disappearing windows not in persistence fashion.
>
> Probably it is some complicated situation where my hooks fail

It would help if you can reproduce it using a vanilla stumpwm.

Regards,
-- 
Julian Stecklina

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge