Re: [STUMP] [UPDATE]Re: Tag-based window management

[Vitaly Mayatskikh]

At Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:07:59 +0400, Michael Raskin wrote:

> > I guess, your X sends events which stumpwm doesn't understand. I have
> > relatively the same situation with virt-manager window.
> 
> I doubt it. If that was the case, I would expect the effect to be
> persistent - as in Thunderbird temporary windows always get stuck. That
> is not the case, however. That looks more like "any temporary window has
> a fixed small probability of not disappearing".

I had disappearing windows not in persistence fashion.
-- 
wbr, Vitaly