[Spam-discuss] Re: licensing of spamd/spamc

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

Craig R Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:

> flattered that the FSF is using our stuff!

That's kind of you to say.  In fact, it is we who are always excited to
see others developing useful Free Software.  Without thousands of
volunteers like yourself, the FSF wouldn't be able to do the job that we
do.

> Yes indeed, I intended the software to be covered under the same dual-license
> (really just one license with an option) as perl itself.  I will update the
> source to reflect that,

Thanks very much for clarifying the licensing for us.

As far as the staff and volunteers here can tell, we appear to be the
first large shop to actively try to hook up SpamAssassin and TMDA
together.  We're hoping to generate some useful HOWTOs and/or patches on
what we did.

   -- bkuhn

pgpCFCWh4nmmr.pgp
Description: PGP signature