[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] the applications layer
From: |
Melvin Carvalho |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] the applications layer |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:55:15 +0100 |
On 3 December 2010 17:04, Joe Corneli <address@hidden> wrote:
> As I understand it, Facebook exploits semi-open information in a
> semi-centralized way. Instead of the Applications layer being
> something that people can really socialize about, it only supports a
> closed, firm-like, collaboration at that layer. I hope that Diaspora*
> et al. will support "social apps" that aren't just miniature corporate
> themeparks, but which instead correspond to real "grassroots social
> organizing". How might that work?
>
> Some analogies: this might be like adding a "problems" layer on top
> of PlanetMath's mathematics encyclopedia, or like adding a radio drama
> layer on top of the collection of sounds at Freesound.org, or like
> adding a literary discussion layer on top of the collection of public
> domain texts at Project Gutenberg.
>
> Indeed, maybe these aren't just analogies, but could themselves become
> "applications".
OpenSocial are going to do some work with OStatus. This a kind of
facebook apps clone, with the container/app model, ie not designed as
full peer to peer.
I think HTML5 will better allow you to build generic peer to peer apps
using Web Standards.
>
>