sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at t


From: Tom at FlowCrypt
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:19:32 +0100

Robert,

No doubt it's risky to implement things that there is no consensus on. But the device I'm writing this on was invented by *not a consensus*, and a consensus to design it would not have emerged on this list nor elsewhere. 

The risk may be lowered:

1) on behalf of our company I'm excited to run whatever not-sks testnode you prototype 

2) fwiw there's Hockeypuck written in a popular language and popular db. The sks recon is separated into a module, and could be swapped out. All the other bells and whistles of a ks are there. 

3) find one more person and we can call it a test network

As an alternative to Hockeypuck, we also use a keyserver on the backend written in Node/TypeScript and postgres that I'd be happy to strip/clean up and contribute. It has no sync nor consensus built in. Based on OpenPGP.js. I wrote it purely out of my frustration with sks. 

I think this list needs resolute action, not consensus. Resolute action is risky, sure.

My company will issue a modest grant to get a ball rolling on whatever is not-sks, implemented by a person with a brain (you're overqualified!). 

Cheers,
Tom


On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, 08:46 Robert J. Hansen <address@hidden wrote:
> It is no use to wait a great consensus.

Without exception, I have never met someone who was reluctant to
volunteer someone else's time.  I think this is unfortunate.  I'd rather
we were as reluctant to urge other people to commit their time and
effort to a project as we are to commit our own.

_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]