[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Another poison-key?
|
From: |
Kim Minh Kaplan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Another poison-key? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:41:43 +0000 |
Jason John Schwarz wrote:
> I pushed my command_timeout up to 180 seconds per Kim's recommendation, but
> that seems to cause the web interface to be very sluggish
> during the period of key loads. I assume that is because the single thread
> is busy. Any thoughts the trade off of the web interface being slow
> randomly versus the SigAlarm on performance?
Yes, during the storing of the huge key, the server will not
answerother queries due to its single threaded and single query
conception.
My first thoughts regarding this setting:
1, SKS is not suited as a web interface so this point seems moot,
2, being slow (around 3 minutes) once to accept the key appears
betterthan being a little slow (around 1 minute) frequently,
3, alas as I mentioned earlier this is just pushing the problem ahead,
4, I believe the key has yet grown a bit further in the mean time.I.e.
somebody is actively hurting SKS :-(
--
Kim Minh.