[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] Clustering (Was: New Keyservers and Dumps)

From: Michael Jones
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Clustering (Was: New Keyservers and Dumps)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:46:55 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

I've setup my cluster with separate filesystems, as I believe locks are
created on the bdb so the sks instances would lock each other if they
shared, otherwise i would have used nfs or gluster.

Kind Regards,

On 24/08/18 10:36, Gabor Kiss wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Are the servers clustered in any way? In my experience each site needs
>> at least 3 nodes to ensure proper operation (mainly if A and B are
>> gossipping C can still respond to requests, depending on the amount of
>> traffic / speed of the node to return more is better)
>> So clustered setup is more important than large number of individual
>> servers, as there is no retry functionality in dirmngr.
> A question:
> Does an SKS cluster need multiple storage space,
> or nodes can share the database?
> Cheers
> Gabor

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]