[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?
From: |
Christoph Egger |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:24:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Андрей Коробков <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm using btrfs on server and reiserfs on desktop. May be, BDB do some
> very-low level things?...
Is one of them 64 bit and the other 32 bit? If so that'll break. If the
server is 32bit you could build it on your desktop using a 32bit chroot
environment.
> After more than 24 hours no visible progress at n=1 (RAM=256 Mb)... :(
For building on the server it was necessary to turn down some parameters
to the import run for my keyserver ( -n 10 -> something smaller in
sks_build.sh)
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
pgpbxgEXJhi_0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Андрей Коробков, 2011/04/04
- [Sks-devel] IPv6 peering, Gabor Kiss, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, C.J. Adams-Collier, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Christoph Egger, 2011/04/04
- [Sks-devel] Re: Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Андрей Коробков, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Andrey Korobkov, 2011/04/06
Message not available