Re: Question regarding "paragraph" and "p"

[Michael Vehrs]

On 1/15/21 9:08 AM, Michael Vehrs wrote:
> On 1/14/21 3:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Michael Vehrs <Michael.Burschik@gmx.de> skribis:
> >
> > > As far as I can tell, this definition from package/base.scm means
> > > that p
> > > will only ever call paragraph with the minimum arguments, making it
> > > impossible to extend p:
> > >
> > > (define-markup (p :rest opt :key ident (class #f))
> > >     (paragraph :ident ident :class class :loc &invocation-location
> > >        (the-body opt)))
> > >
> > > I would consider this a bug. I think it would be better to define p in
> > > the usual way, and to extend markup-writer to handle a list of markup
> > > elements.
> > Doesn’t that just mean that ‘p’ is an alias for ‘paragraph’, and that
> > all you have to do is define a markup writer for ‘paragraph’? Or am I
> > missing something?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ludo’.
> No, it is not an alias. If I extend paragraph with further :options
> (e.g. paragraph alignment), they will not be picked up by "p".
>
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
The attachments illustrate the problem.


Regards

Michael

para.skb
Description: Text document

para.scm
Description: Text Data