Re: [Simulavr-devel] More trouble with new auto* infrastructure

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Klaus Rudolph wrote:

> On my personal system I installed binutils/gcc etc from the
> distribution CD and the binutils/avr-gcc from source which results
> in different versions of binutils which means different versions of
> bfd.h. And compiling with a non compatible header will result in any
> kind of errors.

Of course, the version of libbfd.a/libbfd.so and bfd.h must match.

My only argument is *against* a test for an AVR-specific build of
libbfd that explicitly tests for the existance of avr-elf32.o within
the archive, and is thus rejecting the system libbfd even if
explicitly requesting it through --with-libbfd-path=/usr.

This test has not been there previously, and only came in with Bill's
recent changes.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)